Posted: Wednesday, 21 March 2007
Executive Summary
Proponents of the BC-Alberta Trade, Investment, and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA) claim that it will provide large economic benefits through the elimination of inter-provincial trade barriers.
In fact, there are very few obstacles to trade and investment among provinces, and no evidence that such obstacles entail significant economic costs:
- Research conducted for the 1985 Macdonald Commission concluded that inter-provincial barriers cost no more than 0.05% of Gross Domestic Product.
- Relative to distance and market size, Canadian provinces are far more likely to trade with each other than with American states.
- Since 2000, inter-provincial trade has been growing much faster than Canada's international trade.
A Conference Board of Canada study commissioned by the BC government claims that TILMA will add $4.8 billion to the province's economy. However, this study is deeply flawed:
- It makes no attempt to list, or estimate the cost of, trade barriers between provinces.
- Rather than using standard economic techniques, the Conference Board infers huge benefits from a tiny survey of business organizations and government ministries.
- The Conference Board doubles its estimate of TILMA’s benefits through a simple arithmetic error. Even after correcting this error, most of the projected gains are from industries exempt from the final agreement or from industries that barely engage in inter-provincial trade.
This paper was released by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives on February 15, 2007.
Read more - Download the PDF.

The Myth of Inter-provincial Trade Barriers and TILMA’s Alleged Economic Benefits